Fast Routing Table
| If you are asking about… | Short answer | Best next page |
|---|---|---|
| What Z00Z is | Confidential settlement with an integral wallet role, an open-source reference wallet, and bounded operator surfaces | What Is Z00Z |
| Whether a feature is live | Check the page’s maturity note and evidence anchors | Live vs Target |
| Which GitHub repo should own the issue | Core code goes to z00z; website rendering and docs go to z00z-website |
Contact Us |
| Lost backups or wallet recovery | Public contact channels do not have a hidden recovery switch | Wallet Recovery Safety |
| Security or privacy incidents | Use the sensitive-reporting path, not ordinary public support | Responsible Disclosure |
| Repo-local website docs or build failures | Follow the local website verification path first | Troubleshooting |
Use the table to choose the first route. Use the deeper answer sections below when the short route still leaves a trust, maturity, or safety boundary unclear.
What is Z00Z in one sentence?
Z00Z is best described as confidential settlement with an integral wallet role: wallet-local ownership meaning, narrow public settlement evidence, and scoped disclosure paths above the core. The wallet is part of Z00Z by design, while custody or other service classification depends on actual control and operation.
Is this repository the full protocol implementation?
No. This repository is a docs and site workspace. It proves the public documentation surface, the whitepaper corpus, the build and verification flow for the site, and the current wording of reader-facing claims. It does not by itself prove that every runtime subsystem discussed in the papers is already shipped here as local code.
Does privacy mean no one can see anything?
No. The safe claim is limited public observability, not total invisibility. Public observers can still see checkpointed artifacts and timing surfaces. Operators and external services may still see workflow-specific information. The intended boundary is that private ownership meaning stays wallet-local where possible and disclosure stays scoped rather than universal.
Is the wallet part of Z00Z?
Yes—the wallet role is an essential part of Z00Z. The z00z_wallets crate
is one open-source reference/demo implementation, not a requirement to reproduce
the same Rust program architecture. Anyone may fork, modify, or extend it under
its license, or build a custom wallet that conforms to the canonical Z00Z
transaction/package formats and settlement validation rules. The user controls
keys, local settings, transaction history, backups, receipts, and disclosures
and remains responsible for duties applicable to the user’s own conduct.
Wallet software is not a legal person. Project-linked and independent operators
retain duties arising from what they distribute, operate, or control. See
Wallet SDK.
Can I configure the wallet for my country or region?
Yes. The Z00Z wallet contract permits reference and custom implementations to offer country, regional, business-use, or user-defined policy profiles above base consensus. A user may select, modify, or create a profile without changing transaction compatibility. A profile is a tool, not legal advice or automatic compliance certification. The user selects, verifies, updates, and applies the profile, keeps the local transaction history and supporting records, makes required disclosures, and remains responsible before competent authorities in the user’s jurisdiction. See User-Configured Jurisdiction Policy Profiles.
If I lose my seed or backup, can the protocol restore my funds?
No. The current architecture treats recovery as wallet-side and operational, not as a protocol-side clawback power. If private recovery material is lost, the protocol does not magically reconstruct it from a public account table. That is why the safety rule against sharing or losing backups is so strict.
How do I know whether a feature is live or still target architecture?
Read the page’s visible Maturity: note and then check the evidence section. In this repo, mature wording should be tied either to repo-local files or to explicit content/whitepapers/ citations. If the language sounds broader than the evidence, treat it cautiously and compare it with the security or developer pages.
Where should I start if a local docs command fails?
Use Troubleshooting. The live website-repo commands are the ones defined in package.json and explained in README.md. For most contributor problems in this repo, the shortest reliable path is npm ci, then npm run lint, then npm run verify.
Which GitHub repo should I use?
Use z00z-labs/z00z for Rust workspace, runtime, wallet, simulator, and protocol-code issues. Use z00z-labs/z00z-website for docs-site rendering, navigation, route, Markdown, _meta.yaml, and search-coverage issues. If the issue is sensitive, do not open a public issue in either repo; use Responsible Disclosure.
Where should security bugs or privacy leaks be reported?
Do not post sensitive exploit details in ordinary public support threads. Use the security flow documented under /docs/security, especially Responsible Disclosure. Public issues are for non-sensitive docs and repo problems, not for live exploit writeups or secret material.
Does Z00Z endorse third-party issuers, bridges, or services?
Not by default. Third-party assets, issuers, bridges, and services are independent only when the operating facts support that statement. The Z00Z reference wallet is not a third-party product merely because it is a separate crate. A custom wallet may be independent when the operating facts support that classification. A docs mention or integration possibility does not turn an external promise into a protocol guarantee.
Are audits already complete for every major surface?
That would be too broad a claim. The safer question is: which surface was reviewed, against what evidence, and with what residual risk left open? Use Audits And Reviews to interpret current and future review claims without collapsing them into one reassuring label.
Is Z00Z already end-to-end post-quantum secure?
No. The post-quantum paper is explicit that Z00Z is not end-to-end post-quantum secure today. What can be said more safely is that the system has a PQ-friendly settlement and storage boundary that makes migration more plausible, while authorization and confidential amount protection remain narrower and harder frontiers.
Can I contribute without touching protocol code?
Yes. This repo already supports useful contributions in docs, navigation, search coverage, claim discipline, source alignment, and workflow correctness. A careful rewrite that removes overclaiming or improves safe user routing is meaningful protocol-adjacent work because it changes what readers believe the system can actually do.
Where do I go next?
Go to Troubleshooting for website-repo command help, Wallet Recovery Safety for secret-handling rules, Developer Support for builder questions, or /docs/security if the issue may be sensitive.
Newcomer Questions
If you are new to Z00Z, start with three boundaries. First, the docs describe a protocol and site corpus, not a guarantee that every future product surface is live. Second, privacy is layered: settlement privacy, transport privacy, wallet behavior, and disclosure safety are separate. Third, evidence matters: a claim should point to a whitepaper, a repo file, a verification command, or a scoped review. If an answer depends on maturity, the safe answer says so.
Protocol And Wallet Questions
Protocol questions should usually route to the main whitepaper and protocol docs. Wallet questions should route to wallet-local possession and wallet recovery safety. Do not treat a wallet support answer as a promise that support can recover secrets or reverse a lost local state. The FAQ should keep repeating that public settlement evidence is not a public account table and that private ownership meaning depends on local wallet material.
Legal, Token, And Service Questions
Legal and token questions need precise wording. Z00Z docs should not imply yield, dividends, undisclosed managed custody, exchange services, bridge guarantees, or blanket compliance. The wallet role remains part of Z00Z; reference and custom implementations, external issuers, lockers, bridges, venues, and services are attributed according to actual control and are separate only when verified. Use the Compliance Framework as the single source for the general rule.
Does Z00Z eliminate KYC, AML/CFT/CPF, sanctions, Travel Rule, licensing, recordkeeping, monitoring, or reporting obligations?
No. The base protocol limits public settlement data, while the integrated wallet keeps the user’s transaction meaning and history local. In the ordinary self-custodial model, the user chooses the relevant jurisdiction policy profile, uses the wallet lawfully, keeps required records, and meets tax, accounting, reporting, disclosure, sanctions, licensing, or other duties that apply to the user’s own conduct. A separate service still keeps any duty directly and applicable to that service’s actual functions; neither the protocol nor the profile removes or reallocates it.
Developer And Contributor Questions
Developer answers should point to real local commands and files. If a question asks how to validate the website, the answer is npm run verify, backed by scripts/verify.sh. If a question asks where route content comes from, point to content/, _meta.yaml, and src/lib/content/. If a question asks whether a protocol feature exists in this website repo, separate docs evidence from protocol implementation evidence.
Contributor answers should be equally bounded. A useful contribution can improve docs, routing, source mapping, examples, or review evidence. It should not add unsupported product promises. If a contribution includes security-sensitive material, do not route it through ordinary public contribution channels.
Safety Questions
The shortest safety answer is: do not share secrets, do not trust DMs, and do not treat support as custody. If a helper asks for recovery words, private keys, wallet exports, remote access, or unredacted logs, stop and use the security path. If a page tells you that a service is official or guaranteed, verify that claim against the current legal and security pages before relying on it.
Answer Boundaries
FAQ answers are short without becoming unsupported. Each answer either points to a deeper source or states the boundary directly. The highest-risk topics are recovery, privacy, post-quantum security, external services, tokens, and maturity; the answers remain conservative even when a simpler answer would sound more attractive.
The FAQ is not a second specification. An answer needing more than a compact boundary routes to the owning documentation, which keeps future changes centralized and prevents support copy from drifting away from the corpus.
Final Boundary
The FAQ should answer quickly, then route precisely. If a short answer would hide maturity, source, security, legal, wallet, or service boundaries, the answer should be longer or link to the deeper page that owns the answer and the evidence behind it.
When in doubt, the FAQ should choose safety and source traceability over speed.
Short answers still need evidence.
Read Next
Read What Is Z00Z for orientation, Security Overview for trust boundaries, Wallet Recovery Safety for secret handling, and Contact Us for repo and channel routing.
Evidence and Further Reading
- Main Whitepaper sections 2, 5, 9, 10, and 12 define wallet-local possession, recovery limits, operator boundaries, and the current maturity line between live and target surfaces.
- Privacy Threat Model And Metrics sections 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 are the main source anchors for limited public observability, observer-specific risk, scoped disclosure, wallet behavior, and telemetry caution.
- Post-Quantum Migration sections 3, 4, 8, 10, and 12 explain why the correct cryptographic claim today is narrower than “fully PQ secure.”
- Legal Architecture sections 4, 7, 9, 10, 17, and Appendix A provide the safe public-claim formulas for self-custody, reference implementations, scoped disclosure, and external-service responsibility.